西藏及其周邊山區的冰量雖不如南北極,但還是相當可觀。該區擁有46,000條冰河,170萬平方公里的永凍層,厚度可達130公尺深。此區冰層的命運會直接影響非常多人,亞洲有十條大河的源頭在此,流域人口約為15億;歡迎來到地球的「第三極」。
      
       第三極的研究非常有限,但在2009年時,青藏高原研究的姚檀棟、俄亥俄大學的Lonnie Thompson、森根堡世界生物多樣性聯盟的Volker Mosbrugger,開始推動了名為第三極環境(TPE)的計畫,上個月也舉行了第四次研討會。
去
年有項研究指出,西藏高源的冰河正在增加,但蘇黎士大學的Tobias 
Bolch表示,該研究所使用的衛星適於調查南北極,但不適合西藏高原這樣的山區。姚博士團隊的研究顯示,第三極的冰成湖自1970年代至今增加了約
26%;Bolch博士認為,先前研究中的衛星可能誤將這些湖泊當成冰河。
Bolch博士的團隊用另一種衛星調查之後,結論為許多西藏冰河
都在倒退,但也不是所有的冰河都在後退;姚博士和Thompson博士的研究指出,部分冰河確實有在前行,且大多位於西部的喀喇昆崙和帕米爾地區,但東部
的喜瑪拉牙和西藏高原的冰河則快速後退。總體而言,第三極的冰減少了許多。
研討會除了確認第三極的冰確實在減少之外,也顯示了該區的情況相當危險且資料不足。因此,中國科學院也撥出了4億人民幣的第三極研究資金。
       
       
         
          
           
            
           
                 
        
      
The following 3 pages are in this category, out of 3 total. This list may not reflect recent changes (
I
 The Insukati Valley is China's largest glacier valley located on the northern slope of the Karakoram Range which is between Xinjiang and Pakistan.
The glacier found in this valley is about 41.5 kilometres long, covering an area of 392.4 square kilometres.[
citation
K
 
 
The east face (Kangshung Face) of 
Everest (centre) and 
Lhotse (left). In front: the Kangshung Glacier
 
 
 
The 
Kangshung Glacier is one of the three main 
glaciers of 
Mount Everest, the others being the 
Khumbu Glacier and 
Rongbuk Glacier. The Kangshung Glacier's 
accumulation areas
 lie on the three main faces of Everest. The Kangshung Glacier is 
located on the eastern side of the world's highest mountain in the 
government district of 
Shigatse in the 
Tibet Autonomous Region of the 
People's Republic of China.
The common eastern face of Everest and 
Lhotse is called the 
Kangshung Face.
 Here, the Kangshung Glacier is fed and then flows through the Kangshung
 Valley towards the east. South of the glacier east of Lhotse lie the 
Pethangtse (6738 m) and the massif of the 
Makalu (8463 m) with its neighbouring peaks of Makalu II (7678 m - also called Kangshungtse) and 
Chomo Lonzo (7818 m), whose imposing north face hides the view of the main summit. The border between 
Nepal and China runs over this summit.
The east side of Mount Everest is the least accessible and developed 
side of the mountain. While the base camp on the Rongbuk Glacier can be 
accessed by jeep and the south side of Everest can be reached after a 
multi-day hike using fortified lodges for overnight stays, the Kangshung
 Glacier can only be reached following an approach march of several 
days, including a pass crossing.
R
 
    
        
    
    
                
    
Rongbuk Glacier and Mount Everest as seen from the International Space Station.
 
 
 
The 
Rongbuk Glacier (
simplified Chinese: 
绒布冰川; 
traditional Chinese: 
絨布冰川; 
pinyin: 
Róngbù Bīngchuān) is located in the 
Himalaya of southern 
Tibet.
 Two large tributary glaciers, the East and West Rongbuk Glaciers flow 
into the Rongbuk Glacier. It flows north and forms the Rongbuk Valley 
north of 
Mount Everest. The famous 
Rongbuk Monastery
 is located at the northern end of the Rongbuk valley. Mount Everest is 
the source of the Rongbuk Glacier and East Rongbuk Glacier.
Tibetan Glaciers Are Retreating 
       At An Alarming Rate
By James Hansen 
Glaciers
 on the Tibetan Plateau, sometimes called Earth's "third pole", hold the
 largest ice mass outside the polar regions. These glaciers act as a 
water storage tower for South and East Asia, releasing melt water in 
warm months to the Indus, Ganges, Brahmaputra and other river systems, 
providing fresh water to more than a billion people. In the dry season 
glacial melt provides half or more of the water in many rivers. 
    
Figure 1. Five
 ice cores were extracted from the indicated locationson the Tibetan 
plateau. The white dashed line is the northerly boundary of the Indian 
monsoon.
Tibetan glaciers have been melting
 at an accelerating rate over the past decade. Glacier changes depend on
 local weather, especially snowfall, so glacier retreat or advance 
fluctuates with time and place. Thus it is inevitable that some Tibetan 
glaciers advance over short periods, as has been reported. But overall, 
Tibetan glaciers are retreating at an alarming rate. 
Global warming must be the primary
 cause of glacier retreat, which is occurring on a global scale, but 
observed rapid melt rates suggest that other factors may be involved. To
 investigate the possible role of black soot in causing glacial melt, a 
team of scientists from Chinese research institutes extracted ice cores 
from five locations on the Tibetan Plateau (Figure 1). 
Black soot, which includes black 
carbon (BC) and organic carbon (OC), absorbs sunlight and can speed 
glacial melting if BC reaches values of order 10 ng/g (nanograms per 
gram) or larger. The ice core data revealed that BC reached values of 
20-50 ng/g in the 1950s and 1960s for the four stations that are 
downwind of European pollution sources. BC and OC amounts decreased 
strongly in the early 1970s, probably because of clean air regulations 
in Europe. 
However, the ice cores also reveal
 that in the past decade BC and OC began to increase again, even on the 
Zuoqiupu glacier (Figure 2), which is mainly subject to Asian sources. 
The data suggest that increased black soot arises from Asian sources, 
especially the Indian subcontinent. 
The measured concentrations of BC 
and OC refer to fresh snow. But as the snow melts in the spring and 
summer the black soot concentrations on the glacier surface increase, 
because the soot particles do not escape in the melt water as 
efficiently as the water itself. As a consequence, the soot noticeably 
darkens the glacier surface during the melt season, increases absorption
 of sunlight, and speeds glacier disintegration. 
        
       
Figure 2. Black
 carbon (BC) and organic carbon (OC) concentrations in the Zuoqiupu ice 
core for the monsoon (June-Sept) and non-monsoon (Oct-May) seasons, and 
the annual mean. 
In a new paper by Xu et al., we 
concluded that black soot is contributing to the rapid melt of glaciers 
in the Himalayas. And continued, "business-as-usual" emissions of 
greenhouse gases and black soot will result in the loss of most 
Himalayan glaciers this century, with devastating effects on fresh water
 supplies in dry seasons. 
But business-as-usual emissions 
are not inevitable. An alternative scenario, which stabilizes the 
glaciers and has other benefits for global climate and human health, 
requires a reduction of major human-made climate forcing agents that 
have a warming effect — that means greenhouses gases, especially carbon 
dioxide, as well as black soot. 
Quantitative policy implications 
have been defined: coal emissions must be phased out over the next 20 
years, and unconventional fossil fuels, such as tar sands and oil shale,
 must remain undeveloped. Combined with improved agricultural and 
forestry practices and reduction of methane and black soot emissions, 
these actions would avoid demise of the Tibetan glaciers. 
Not coincidentally, these policy 
actions are the same as those required to stabilize Earth's energy 
balance and keep the climate near the Holocene climate range in which 
civilization developed. The question is whether the global community can
 exercise the free will to limit fossil fuel emissions and move to clean
 energies of the future — or is it inevitable that all fossil fuels will
 be burned? 
The conclusion is that prospects 
for survival of Tibetan glaciers can be much improved by reducing black 
soot emissions. The black soot arises especially from diesel engines, 
coal use without effective scrubbers, and biomass burning, including 
cook stoves. Reduction of black soot via cleaner energies would have 
other benefits for human health and agricultural productivity. However, 
survival of the glaciers also requires halting global warming, which 
depends upon stabilizing and reducing greenhouse gases, especially 
carbon dioxide. 
         Related Links
      References
Xu, B, J. Cao, J. Hansen, T. Yao, D.J. Joswia, N. Wang, G. Wu, M. Wang, H. Zhao, W. Yang, X. Liu, and J. He, 2009: 
Black soot and the survival of Tibetan glaciers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910444106, in press. 
Hansen, J., Mki. Sato, P. 
Kharecha, D. Beerling, R. Berner, V. Masson-Delmotte, M. Pagani, M. 
Raymo, D.L. Royer, and J.C. Zachos, 2008: 
Target atmospheric CO2: Where should humanity aim? Open Atmos. Sci. J., 2, 217-231, doi:10.2174/1874282300802010217.
         Contact